Tool review / sheetThe Field File — Workiz

Verified JUN 2026

Re-verify dueDEC 2026

Mentions32

Drawn byCommunity

Index/Tools/Workiz

Tool spec file · scored on four axes, never averaged

Workiz

Name: Workiz
Brand: Workiz Inc.

Vendor · Workiz Inc.

A community-scored read on Workiz across the four axes that decide whether FSM software survives contact with a real crew. The verdict for your shop size leads — every figure that backs it traces to a logged operator source.

Community-ScoredVerified JUN 202632 mentions aggregated

Axis scorecard · /10

CoverageCOV

Migration painMIG

Pricing honestyPRC

Field usabilityFLD

Verdict — by crew size

Never one global recommendation

Pick your shop. The verdict is segmented by crew size — never one global recommendation. This is the answer first; the axis scores and the evidence that back it follow below.

Read your crew sizeTap to highlight yours

CRW-011SoloCRW-022–5Small crewCRW-035–20Mid shopCRW-0420+Large

All four verdicts · always on file

Solo · 1

DRAFT — Not enough community evidence to verdict (Coverage UNSCORED). Directional: workable but community flags it as expensive for a solo operator with paid-extra unbundling and annual lock-in.

Crew · 2–5

DRAFT — Not enough community evidence to verdict. Directional: this is Workiz's sweet spot — multiple recent switchers off HCP/Jobber/ServiceTitan at this scale report it works and is simpler/cheaper, tempered by app bugs and support complaints.

Crew · 5–20

DRAFT — Not enough community evidence to verdict. Directional: feasible (DiscussionUnlucky584 ran 10 accounts) but Ultimate-tier feature gating and billing-dispute reports ($800 overbill, ignored reductions) are a real risk at this size.

Crew · 20+

DRAFT — Not enough community evidence to verdict. Directional: a 5-yr operator outgrew Workiz going commercial and is switching to ServiceTitan; no first-hand 20+ success stories found — likely not the right fit at this scale.

Score first · links second

This verdict was set before any link.

Scores are set before any affiliate link is added. A tool with no affiliate program that scores higher still ranks higher. The score is the score — the verdict above did not move for a payout.

DISCLOSURE

If you sign up to Workiz through a link on this page we may earn a commission. That arrangement is added after the scores are locked, and it can never change a score.

Axis scores

COV · MIG · PRC · FLD

Four axes, each scored on its own evidence. The mention count and source mix next to every score tell you how much community weight stands behind it — read the evidence as carefully as the number. Each bar marks 0 / 5 / 10.

COV

Coverage

Completeness across real FSM jobs — scheduling, dispatch, invoicing.

6/10Mixed

0510

Community-Scored8 mentions · reddit:8

MIG

Migration pain

Pain of switching onto it. Lower pain scores higher.

4/10Weak

0510

Community-Scored8 mentions · reddit:8

PRC

Pricing honesty

Predictable pricing versus surprise fees.

3/10Weak

0510

Community-Scored8 mentions · reddit:8

FLD

Field usability

Usable in the field, on a phone, by a tech.

4/10Weak

0510

Community-Scored8 mentions · reddit:8

An axis under 8 independent data points is never scored. We show the gap rather than guess across it.

Evidence provenance

Where the evidence came from

Total evidence

32 independent mentions

Evidence tier

Community-Scored

Last verified

JUN 2026 · re-verify DEC 2026

Source breakdown

RelatedPricing report Alternatives

See Workiz pricingAffiliate links, when present, are added after the score is locked. They never change a score.